In 2012, we
were pleased to see four RFPs requiring that at least some specific services be
broken out with an accompanying cost for
each. Two went so far as to declare
group insurance commissions to be school
district money (and it really is!) and require that a robust set of HR-related
services be provided in exchange for any dollars a broker receives from
an insurance company. Most RFPs required
that a commission percentage be attached to each line of coverage or that a
fixed commission dollar amount be disclosed.
While on the
right track, these RFP requirements fail to break through the broker smoke
screen. Instead, they seem to have served as a catalyst for brokers to become
even stealthier on the compensation front.
It’s easy for a broker to disclose
a lower fee or commission amount in their official response, then turn around
and require the insurance carrier to pay them an "implementation fee"
to the tune of tens of thousands of dollars. Is having the carrier make a
contribution to the servicing of your business wrong? Not necessarily. But if it’s done behind the scenes and the
broker communicates the requirement to the carriers in his bidding process,
then the carrier payment just becomes an additional (hidden) cost that gets
buried in your (and your employees’) rates and the broker thus obscures a cost
that would otherwise be visible – at least to someone who knew where to look. We saw insurance brokers employ some
variation of this tactic on every one of the RFP’s mentioned
above.
Best Firm Never Chosen!
Besides
pushing up your rates, hidden/undisclosed compensation has another huge consequence. In the RFP processes discussed above, the
systems did not select the advisor that scored the highest on their technical
proposal evaluation! In other words, the firm deemed most capable was never chosen. With the more frequent use of the State
purchasing methodology, which works reasonably well when costs can be clearly
identified – the points awarded for (artificially) low bids, tipped the scales
in favor of a less qualified firm. We
all make the cost/value decision every day in our personal and work lives – but
if the cost element is not clear, then no process, however disciplined, can
make up for it. In this situation, the
buyers not only ended up with less capable “partners” -- they likely paid more to a firm that wasn’t deserving of
their trust, let alone their business.
With school systems
starting to demand that compensation be fully disclosed so that they can ensure
value for every dollar they and their employees spend on benefits, brokers have
simply moved the shells around to continue to hide their compensation. We’re not saying that compensation is a bad
thing. You can’t get great work done
without paying for it. We’re just saying
you have the right to know exactly what it is.
And ideally, your selected advisor is motivated to keep your costs as
low as possible. No such motivation is
evident in the insurance broker community – especially those working with
school systems.
Excessive Compensation in Plain Sight
While this
article is largely about how cleverly insurance brokers conceal compensation,
let’s not forget about the excessive compensation that is hiding in plain
sight. Has your broker installed whole
life or universal life products in your benefits program? Cancer insurance? If so, you can anticipate your broker
receiving 60-90% commissions on your employees’ contributions. Did your broker put AFLAC or Colonial
products in your program? Why? They would never win a competitive bid
process, so how were they selected? Think
big, undisclosed compensation. These are
technically individual policies that require no disclosure whatsoever.
There is no
justification for these high-priced, high-commission products in your
program.
If you’re
planning an RFP in 2013, be aware of the new (and old!) hidden ways insurance brokers
find to make money off your district and your employees. Keep in mind that an insurance broker, by
definition, makes his money selling insurance for commissions. If you’re content with the limited services
they provide, at least make sure you know where all the dollars are so that you
can make a legitimate cost/value analysis.
Hint: you should either be paying a lot less than you are now, or
getting much more from someone who can provide a broader scope of service. You know that benefits are only a piece of
the pie in HR—so don’t squander hard-to-find dollars (your system’s or your
employees’) on limited or sub-par services.
In an effort
to help school systems across Georgia avoid these money-burning pitfalls, we’ve
drafted agreements that you can require be signed as part of your RFP process, or
to keep your current broker/consultant and carriers honest and
transparent. We’ve also included a chart
showing the various types of costs buried in your benefits program so you have
a better idea of where to look. ClickHere to download this packet and protect your System and your employees
from being overcharged!
Posted By: Eric Kiesshauer
Posted By: Eric Kiesshauer






